The mcculloch v. maryland supreme court case firmly established that

Question

What principle was firmly established by the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland?
a. State governments can overrule the federal government.
b. The federal government cannot tax states.
c. State governments and the federal government share equal powers.
d. The federal government holds supremacy over state governments.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

D. the federal government has more power than state governments.

Anonymous · Answer

The correct answer is D. The McCulloch v. Maryland was a Supreme Court decision issued in 1819 which established that the "necessary and proper clause" included in the US Constitution, grants the federal government certain implied powers which are not mentioned explicitly. In that specific case, the state of Maryland tried to block an operation of the Second Bank of the United States. The court invoked the necessary and proper cause to justify the intervention of the federal goverment. This decision was also crucial in the sense that is established the boundaries between the state and the federal powers, which were unclear until that moment.

Anonymous · Answer

The correct answer is D. The McCulloch v. Maryland was a Supreme Court decision issued in 1819 which established that the "necessary and proper clause" included in the US Constitution, grants the federal government certain implied powers which are not mentioned explicitly. In that specific case, the state of Maryland tried to block an operation of the Second Bank of the United States. The court invoked the necessary and proper cause to justify the intervention of the federal goverment. This decision was also crucial in the sense that is established the boundaries between the state and the federal powers, which were unclear until that moment.

Anonymous · Answer

1. It depends on the issue at hand. It is likely going to be in federal district court as Federal District Courts are most often the court of original jurisdiction. A is likely the right answer. 2. Both are appellate courts, so D is correct. The Supreme Court and the Appellate Courts are both, most of the time, sitting in a review capacity. SO, they are reviewing the lower court's ruling for errors.3. A, C, D. The Supreme Court is the only entity that can issue a writ of cert allowing a case to be heard by the Supreme Court. Appellate Courts can decide that the lower courts were right (A) or wrong (C) and can send the case back down for more information (D).4. BA is incorrect as appellate courts do not hear new facts. A prudent attorney will get all factual matters into the "record" for consideration on appeal. This is one of the key uses of objections.B is correct as a case will often be put on appeal if a lawyer or client feels that the course was not heard "correctly"C is incorrect as magistrate judges do not hear cases on appealD is incorrect as new evidence is not introduced or reintroduced into the record. 5. C is correct as the President nominates Judges and the Senate provides advise and consent. The majority vote rule is new as of the last decade.6. B and D are correct7. A is correct. The Supreme Court is the highest appeals court in the land and their job is to hear and rule on cases.8. C is the correct answer9. B is the correct answer. Marbury v. Madison established judicial review.10. D is the correct answer. Brown v. Board set in motion the desegregation of America's schools.11. B. The Supreme Court can find a law unconstitutional, ending its application and enforceability12. C is correct. The Supreme Court hears cases on appeal and issues a writ of cert13. A is correct. Stare Decisis means letting the decision stand in latin and refers to the principle of following legal precedent.

Anonymous · Answer

D. The federal government has more power than state governments

Anonymous · Answer

Explanation:McCulloch v. Maryland (1819):Handled the 2nd BUS but the State of Maryland didn't like it, therefore the Supreme Court sues Maryland, to show that the Federal Government is supreme over State Governments.Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): Can a State control Interstate Trade? Marshall said no, only congress has control (can be able to control ) Over Interstate Trade.These was how these cases were handled this establishing that the Federal is very Supreme to all State Laws.

Anonymous · Answer

hope this helpExplanation:Under the Constitution, the Supreme Court argued that a strong central government had more power than the states and that states could not tax one part of the federal government without undermining that power.

Anonymous · Answer

Marbury v. Madison is the correct answer.Explanation:By the Marbury v. Madison the US supreme court established the SUpreme courts right of Judicial review. The case arose when President John Adams appointed William Marbury as the justice of peace, the secretary of staste refused to give marbury the document of appointment. Marbury filed a case against the secretary of state. The case was heard by John Marshall who said that the Article three of US constitution didn't allowed one branch of federal government to force any action on other branch. In this case John Marshall ruled that William Marbury was entitled to the position of Justice of Peace but the final decision belonged to the new president Thomas Jefferson.

Anonymous · Answer

Question 14How does the principle of stare decisis affect decisions made by the Supreme Court?It allows justices to consider public opinion when delivering a decision.

Anonymous

The mcculloch v. maryland supreme court case firmly established that

10 Answers

AI-Powered Insights

Want to answer this question?

Categories

Tags

Related Questions