It really depends how you define “science.” General definition is that science is systematically gathering information and putting it together as TESTABLE laws and theories. In the academic circle, there is also the implied feeling that the results from those tests and theories must be repeatable and concrete.This is where the split begins. In science, if you say, in a perfect vacuum, an object will accelerate toward the Earth at 9.8 meters per second, it must do that every time. Otherwise something is wrong with your theory and you need to figure out why at differs. Fortunately for physicists, it does not vary, so now we have the law of gravity. Psychology, on the other hand, really doesn’t have testable results. There just aren’t any psychological test results that you can repeat without variation time and time again. For example, you might find out that 60% of people, given the choice between one big plain chocolate bar and one smaller chocolate bar with peanut butter in it, would choose a bigger but plain chocolate bar. But there’s nothing to really gather from that. You can then ask the subjects why the picked it, but even then you’re not sure if that’s really why or if the subjects just “think” that’s why. It goes on and on and eventually you realize nothing in psychology can be reliably repeated. That’s why other sciences don’t accept it.That DOES NOT mean it’s not valuable. The medical community uses psychology all the time to help with understanding patients, and even medicine itself comes in colors and sizes that have been determined by psychological experiments to increase a patient’s belief that it will work better (hint – people like bright colors and small pills). It just means it’s not accepted as a “true” science.It’s not the only one, either. All the “social” sciences are lumped into this category. Sociology, Geography, Political Science, Archaelogy, Anthropology, History, and Linguistics are all subjects that use scientific methods but are not true sciences.That is why if someone graduates with a degree in any of these fields, like psychology or archaelogy, their degree is a Bachelor of Arts, and not a Bachelor of Science.Edit Based on Asker’s Response: You’re right! I didn’t know that. I guess that’s part isn’t a valid argument for either case. I just read you can get a BSc for Hotel Management and Tourism, so certainly the BA vs. BS thing doesn’t help it either way. Good catch!...
Show More