Which conclusion can be drawn about the second punic war from the information in the map

Question

What conclusions can be drawn about the Second Punic War based on the information presented in the map?

Shaun Gusikowski · Accepted Answer

The Second Punic War was fought between the Romans and the Carthaginians between 218 and 201 BC. The Romans then went on to a several-year war of wear and tear, gradually destroying or neutralizing the allies and main colonies of Carthage, and finally, under the leadership of Publius Cornelius Scipionus Africano, they won the Battle of Zama. This war definitely decided the struggle of both cities for dominance in the Mediterranean in favor of Rome.  Due to the complete destruction of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BC and the long-term hegemony of the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean, no historical sources have been preserved describing the course of the war and its background from a Carthaginian or truly neutral point of view. Historians can therefore rely only on the works of Greek and Roman ancient authors and must therefore interpret them very carefully.

Anonymous · Answer

Rome had enemies both on the Italian peninsula and in North Africa. Explanation: I took the quiz

Anonymous · Answer

The Roman army grew in size and became dominant in the Mediterranean region.Explanation:i did the quiz i got it right 100% sure its correct

Kayley Kunde · Answer

Explanation:In the map, we can notice that Rome had enemies both on the Italian peninsula and in North Africa. In the case of the Italian peninsula, the enemies were located on the south of the peninsula. The section domain by the BRUTTIUM was under Carthaginians domain.The areas were also controlled by Carthage in North Africa and the east of Spain.What we can tell about this distribution?Despite the fact the Roman troupes had strong enemies and the geographic situation wasn´t  ideal they won the second Punic war because their political institutions kept internal peace and order, allowing it to wage external wars with far greater efficiency and ferocity, allowing it to ultimately overcome the catastrophic victories that Hannibal had won in rivers of Roman blood.Roman soldiers were proud of participating in fights and wars and their culture promote those values. Despite the fact they could die, dying for Rome was a great honor.

Anonymous · Answer

In the map, we can notice that Rome had enemies both on the Italian peninsula and in North Africa. In the case of the Italian peninsula, the enemies were located on the south of the peninsula. The section domain by the BRUTTIUM was under Carthaginians domain.The areas were also controlled by Carthage in North Africa and the east of Spain. What we can tell about this distribution?Despite the fact the Roman troupes had strong enemies and the geographic situation wasn´t  ideal they won the second Punic war because their political institutions kept internal peace and order, allowing it to wage external wars with far greater efficiency and ferocity, allowing it to ultimately overcome the catastrophic victories that Hannibal had won in rivers of Roman blood.Roman soldiers were proud of participating in fights and wars and their culture promote those values. Despite the fact they could die, dying for Rome was a great honor.

Anonymous · Answer

Rome had enemies both on the Italian peninsula and in North Africa.Explanation:I took the quiz

Anonymous · Answer

What effect did the Punic Wars have on Rome's military development?

Anonymous · Answer

The answer is B I think hope it helps

Anonymous · Answer

The Second Punic War, also referred to as The Hannibalic War and (by the Romans) the War Against Hannibal, lasted from 218 to 201 BC[1] and involved combatants in the western and eastern Mediterranean. This was the second major war between Carthage and the Roman Republic and its allied Italic socii, with the crucial participation of Numidian-Berber armies and tribes on both sides. The two states fought three major wars with each other over the course of their existence. They are called the "Punic Wars" because Rome's name for Carthaginians was Poeni, derived from Poenici (earlier form of Punici), a reference to the founding of Carthage by Phoenician settlers.[2][3]

Anonymous

Which conclusion can be drawn about the second punic war from the information in the map

9 Answers

AI-Powered Insights

Want to answer this question?

Categories

Tags

Related Questions